Skip to content

“Followership” in Response to Post-Cold War WMD Proliferation

PhD Abstract

This dissertation examines whether “the West” acted as a cohesive unit in response to weapons of mass destruction proliferation (WMD) from 1989 – 2005. Adapting organizational psychology’s followership framework I examine if Britain, Australia and Israel accepted the Western leadership antiproliferation goals and if they responded with similar action to WMD proliferation. This analysis helps to determine if the Western alignment acted to attain mutual goals using mutually accepted means in their antiproliferation efforts.

While the examination of each state’s policies can stand as an independent case study in antiproliferation, we further our understanding of alignment cohesion through the followership comparative framework. This framework uses a neo-classical realist systemic structure to analyze constructivist identity within the alignment to determine alignment cohesion. Conclusions regarding antiproliferation efforts, identity and “followership” rely on qualitative analysis based on events data and content analysis.

The central question of this research is: how and why did Western alignment cohesion change in response to proliferation in the post-Cold War? This analysis shows that the unity of purpose between the three “follower” states –Australia, Britain, and Israel – was high at the outset of the post-Cold war period. The evidence and analytic framework indicate that this was because the states accepted the leader’s vision for countering proliferation and maintaining the status quo. The “follower identities” of these states changed significantly throughout the 1989 -2001 period as Britain, Australia, and Israel each sought to redefine the goals and actions of the Western alignment in response to WMD proliferation. The three “follower identities” rose, however, as a result of policy changes by both the leader and the three “followers” after September 11, 2001 – and the subsequent attempts at proliferation by states like Iraq, Iran and North Korea, as well as non-state actors like al-Qaeda. As each of the states became a higher-level follower, the level of “followership” rose within the alignment subsystem signifying cohesion within the subsystem.

This demonstrates the value of the followership paradigm in examining the issue of cohesion in response to proliferation in the post-Cold War. This approach also resolves the tension between realist and constructivist analytic frameworks in the examination of alignments.

 

Here is an article that was based on some of my research from this time: Followership in the post Cold War

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email

More to explorer

leadership
Dr. D.

Breaking the Bottleneck

What’s Really Holding Your Business Back Most business owners don’t struggle to grow because of a bad idea, a weak product, or a broken market.

Read More »
Uncategorized
Dr. D.

Networking That Scales

Networking isn’t just about meeting people – it’s about strategically building relationships that fuel long-term business growth. By engaging with value, nurturing connections, and aligning networking with prospecting, you create a system that scales your business smarter, not harder.

Read More »
Uncategorized
Dr. D.

Lead Addiction in Scaling

Too many businesses fall into what I call Lead Addiction—an obsession with collecting leads without ensuring they convert into real revenue. They focus on vanity metrics like lead volume, social media engagement, and website traffic, mistaking these indicators for actual business success. But leads are just potential. And potential is worthless if it never turns into results.

Read More »